Permanent Establishments & Profit Allocation in Tax Audits
Permanent establishment disputes and profit allocation questions are a core application of bilateral correction coordination DE↔CH: what Germany qualifies as PE profit must trigger the corresponding response in Switzerland — and vice versa.
The core issue
Germany and Switzerland often qualify permanent establishments and profit allocation differently. What one tax authority accepts as a legitimate structure, the other may treat as a taxable presence or misallocated profit — resulting in double taxation without a coherent defence.
Typical situations
PE dispute in a tax audit
The German tax authorities assert a permanent establishment in Germany for a Switzerland-resident entity. Or the reverse: a Swiss audit challenges the profit allocation to the German entity. In both cases, the same profit risks being taxed twice without a coordinated position to prevent it.
Permanent establishment profit allocation
Even where a PE is accepted in principle, the quantum of profit attributable to it is regularly disputed. Germany and Switzerland apply the Authorised OECD Approach differently, which can produce divergent profit allocations and a double taxation gap that only coordinated intervention can close.
Estimated assessments of PE profit
Estimated assessments grounded in an asserted PE often require a corresponding correction on the other side — which does not happen automatically. Without active coordination, the double burden persists.
Function transfer
When assets, functions or risks are transferred between Germany and Switzerland, both states examine exit taxation or contribution treatment. The tax treatment on both sides must be aligned to prevent double recognition of the same income or gain.
How we work
Bilateral fact analysis
We analyse the facts under German and Swiss tax law and the relevant DTA provisions simultaneously. The qualification is developed as one coherent structure, not sequentially across two separate teams.
Coordinated proceedings
Objections, submissions and negotiations with tax authorities in both Germany and Switzerland are aligned to a single line — no inconsistency between jurisdictions, no handover between teams.
Litigation or mutual agreement procedure
Depending on the case, the right instrument may be litigation — objection, appeal or court proceedings in Germany or Switzerland — or a mutual agreement procedure under the Germany–Switzerland DTA, or both in parallel in one or both states. We select the appropriate approach and coordinate all proceedings. → Dispute resolution
Contact
Facing a permanent establishment assertion or profit allocation dispute? We assess the situation and coordinate the response across both states.
Zurich office
International qualification and tax adjustments. Transfer pricing, corresponding corrections, Germany–Switzerland coordination and mutual agreement procedures.
Hamburg office
German proceedings support. Tax audits, objections and tax court litigation, procedural and enforcement topics.
*To handle your message with the professional confidentiality required, a window will open where you can send us an encrypted message. You can attach files. After sending, you will receive a confirmation and have the option to download your message.
By contacting us you consent to the internal transfer of your information to that of our offices to which your enquiry is professionally assigned.